- 2006年 7月 16日 14 次提交
-
-
由 rsc 提交于
-
由 rsc 提交于
Add cons_puts for cleaner output.
-
由 rsc 提交于
-
由 rsc 提交于
-
由 rsc 提交于
-
由 rsc 提交于
-
由 rsc 提交于
(Fd_reference sounds like it might just return the ref count.)
-
由 rsc 提交于
Also remove all calls to memcpy in favor of memmove, which has defined semantics when the ranges overlap. The fact that memcpy was working in console.c to scroll the screen is not guaranteed by all implementations.
-
由 rsc 提交于
Removed cli and sti stack in favor of tracking number of locks held on each CPU and explicit conditionals in spinlock.c.
-
由 rsc 提交于
-
由 rsc 提交于
-
由 rsc 提交于
-
由 rsc 提交于
-
由 rsc 提交于
They had been returning 0 on error, 1 on success, but all the callers were checking for return value < 0.
-
- 2006年 7月 15日 1 次提交
-
-
由 rtm 提交于
wakeup1() assumes you hold proc_table_lock sleep(chan, lock) provides atomic sleep-and-release to wait for condition ugly code in swtch/scheduler to implement new sleep fix lots of bugs in pipes, wait, and exit fix bugs if timer interrupt goes off in schedule() console locks per line, not per byte
-
- 2006年 7月 13日 2 次提交
- 2006年 7月 12日 6 次提交
-
-
由 rtm 提交于
exit had acquire where I meant release swtch now checks that you hold no locks
-
由 rtm 提交于
nesting cli/sti: release shouldn't always enable interrupts separate setup of lapic from starting of other cpus, so cpu() works earlier flag to disable locking in console output make locks work even when curproc==0 (still crashes in clock interrupt)
-
由 rtm 提交于
fix race in schedule()
-
由 rtm 提交于
succeeds at usertests.c pipe test
-
由 rtm 提交于
-
由 rtm 提交于
usertest.c tests pre-emption kill()
-
- 2006年 7月 11日 3 次提交
-
-
由 rsc 提交于
Linux 2.4 box using gcc 3.4.6 don't seem to follow the same conventions as the i386-jos-elf-gcc compilers. Can run make 'TOOLPREFIX=' or edit the Makefile. curproc[cpu()] can now be NULL, indicating that no proc is running. This seemed safer to me than having curproc[0] and curproc[1] both pointing at proc[0] potentially. The old implementation of swtch depended on the stack frame layout used inside swtch being okay to return from on the other stack (exactly the V6 you are not expected to understand this). It also could be called in two contexts: at boot time, to schedule the very first process, and later, on behalf of a process, to sleep or schedule some other process. I split this into two functions: scheduler and swtch. The scheduler is now a separate never-returning function, invoked by each cpu once set up. The scheduler looks like: scheduler() { setjmp(cpu.context); pick proc to schedule blah blah blah longjmp(proc.context) } The new swtch is intended to be called only when curproc[cpu()] is not NULL, that is, only on behalf of a user proc. It does: swtch() { if(setjmp(proc.context) == 0) longjmp(cpu.context) } to save the current proc context and then jump over to the scheduler, running on the cpu stack. Similarly the system call stubs are now in assembly in usys.S to avoid needing to know the details of stack frame layout used by the compiler. Also various changes in the debugging prints.
-
由 kaashoek 提交于
-
由 kaashoek 提交于
-
- 2006年 7月 10日 1 次提交
-
-
由 kaashoek 提交于
-
- 2006年 7月 07日 1 次提交
-
-
由 kaashoek 提交于
user program that makes a blocking system call
-
- 2006年 7月 06日 1 次提交
-
-
由 kaashoek 提交于
disk interrupts (assuming bochs has a bug)
-
- 2006年 7月 02日 1 次提交
-
-
由 rtm 提交于
swtch idles on per-CPU stack, not on calling process's stack fix pipe bugs usertest.c tests pipes, fork, exit, close
-
- 2006年 6月 29日 2 次提交
- 2006年 6月 27日 3 次提交
- 2006年 6月 26日 1 次提交
-
-
由 rtm 提交于
-
- 2006年 6月 25日 1 次提交
-
-
由 rtm 提交于
-
- 2006年 6月 23日 2 次提交
- 2006年 6月 22日 1 次提交
-
-
由 rtm 提交于
-